Thursday, August 27, 2009

Bit.ly Teams Up with Yfrog

Bit.ly Teams Up with Yfrog on Image Sharing (WebProNews)
Bit.ly is the leading link shortening service, being the default one on Twitter's website. This week on bit.ly's blog, they pointed out some recent integrations from around the web, where their API is in use. Google Reader is using bit.ly in their new "send-to" feature, which lets users share posts on Twitter with bit.ly URLs. Typepad added a feature that generates bit.ly links on Twitter for ...

Tuesday, August 25, 2009

Public Relations Adds Social Media PR Strategy

Denvers Absolutely Public Relations Adds Social Media PR Strategy & Tactics To Product Line (dBusinessNews.com)
Denver-based Absolutely Public Relations has added social media PR strategy and tactics to its product line. the 10-year-old consulting firm actively embraces all the Web 2.0/social media tools -- including news feed blogs, SEO PR, Podcasting, Wikipedia, Facebook/LinkedIn/Twitter, and video channels such as YouTube -- to help clients turn up the volume on their brands in both traditional and ...

Public Relations Adds Social Media PR Strategy & Tactics

Denver's Absolutely Public Relations Adds Social Media PR Strategy & Tactics To Product Line (PRWeb via Yahoo! News)
Denver-based Absolutely Public Relations has added social media PR strategy and tactics to its product line. The 10-year-old consulting firm actively embraces all the Web 2.0/social media tools -- including news feed blogs, SEO PR, Podcasting, Wikipedia, Facebook/LinkedIn/Twitter, and video channels such as YouTube -- to help clients turn up the volume on their brands in both traditional and ...

Thursday, August 20, 2009

SEO now defined as "see engine optimisation"

Making Money from Blogs: Interview (New Media Knowledge)
Blogging has become almost a must-have for the modern professional and business alike, seen as a good way to issue news and be perceived as a thought leader, with the added bonus of being a great tool for see engine optimisation (SEO).

Wednesday, August 19, 2009

Google Web Site Optimizer Flaw Found

If you have used Google's Web Site Optimizer you know what a useful tool it can be. If you have used it a number of times you may found some limitations with testing what you want, in the way you want to test it.

Well, I thought I found a flaw in how the Optimizer works, and Google has just confirmed that I am correct in my thinking. It's a little confusing to explain, so I will really try to make it clear what the problem is with a simple example:

Goal: To find which of two home page versions convert better.

Method: Create two variations of the home page and see what visitors that hit the home page fill out a form and then see a "thank you" page. Conversion tracking code is located on the "thank you" page and there are no direct links to this conversion page on the site.

Test: The test runs and after some period of time enough data is collected and we may or may not have a "winner" depending on how the conversions went.

Traffic sources: Organic traffic and some paid search traffic to the home page and other topical pages.


So, this sounds like just about every test you have run, right? Therein lies the flaw. Did you spot what the problem is?

I didn't either until I ran a test over the past few weeks, and the results for 9 variations were not only unclear, but also kept changing. This is also something I have seen before, but this time it got me thinking about the process and here is what I realized:

Because there is NO CONTROL over where the traffic lands or it's potential path to the conversion page, one cannot be sure that the conversion ( or lack of conversion ) had anything to do with the page being tested.

Visitors may enter the site at the home page, or they may enter someplace else. If they enter someplace else, then see the home page, they will be included in the test data. And if they do hit the home page, then visit another page which causes them to convert, it will be counted toward the home page version, even if it was really another page that resulted in them converting.

So, the answer to this is to set up your experiment so that you control what people are seeing and what options they have for converting. What I plan on doing in the future is setting up the test on a special page of the site that only gets PPC traffic so I know where it is coming from, and also a special conversion page as well. Visitors may really like our test page, and it may be behind a conversion on a later page, but there is no way to know that so the data really is not that useful and should be excluded.

To restate my solution, I will be setting up landing, contact, and conversion pages. If the conversion results from the test page, I will capture that info. If the visitor leaves the landing page without converting, but converts later, it will not be counted in the test. This will result is some test conversions being lost perhaps, but the data will not be inflated when it should not be. Those of you with one-page sites have been and will still be able to run perfectly accurate tests. :-)






Tuesday, August 18, 2009

Free Search Engine Optimization Workshop

Free Search Engine Optimization Workshop for Lodging and Travel Websites Coming to Denver (PRWeb)
Learn SEO best practices at this hands-on workshop to increase traffic and revenue from your travel or hospitality website. (PRWeb Aug 18, 2009) Read the full story at http://www.prweb.com/releases/2009/08/prweb2763404.htm

Thursday, August 13, 2009

SEO Team Expands After Moving: Pizza Party Blaimed

SEO.com Expands Team Shortly After Moving to New Office (PRWeb via Yahoo! News)
After only a month in its new office, the SEO company adds more staff positions to accommodate a growing clientele. The company has added new search engine optimization specialists, a pay-per-click expert, and others to expand its services.

Wednesday, August 12, 2009

Conversion Fraud More Widespread

Almost anyone that does search marketing and pay-per-click advertising or PPC is aware of the concept of click fraud. They may think it's a small problem or a huge one, but we all know it exists. While advertisers may blow it out of proportion due to poor conversions and sales, the truth is that a poorly run campaign could be partly or completely to blame.

On the other hand we have the search engines that tell advertisers almost nothing about the problem other than that they have "advanced detection methods" in place. Some even provide large refunds from time to time but in most cases refunds are small and seem inappropriate to the lack of ad campaign results. But it can be hard to impossible to tell where the true numbers are.

Most advertisers rely on conversion numbers to tell them if a campaign is working or not, or if it needs to be adjusted. Lack of conversions can also indicate click fraud. Higher conversion number means it is working and should be generating revenue that justifies continued spending.

This post is to inform advertisers, and search engines that care to listen, about what seems to be a growing trend for those committing fraud to cover their tracks: Conversion Fraud.

Here is an example from a contact form:
===========================================
Remote Address: 98.172.1.169

Form Sent From: http ://googleads.g.doubleclick.net/aclk
?sa=l&ai=B4IPZS8jy13AP_7qCtG64YiHYAADM_f___8Yn
uboAo7ACZbbAEdLdYYgq6OAUQABUEAA&num=2
&adurl=
http ://www.thisistheurltomyclientswebsite.org/%3F
type%3Dcontent%26keyword%3Dmachines%26adid
%3D2164885665%26placement%3Dbugabo.cn&client=
ca-afdo-pub-1913393681262590

HTTP User Agent: Mozilla/4.0 (compatible; MSIE 6.0; SV1)
===========================================

Here is what the info is and where it comes from:

- Remote Address:
The IP address of the user

- Form Sent From:
This URL is captured in the form script when executed. It should ALWAYS be the page the form was submitted from. I have edited the first part of the URL so it is not valid, but the placement and publisher info is correct.

- HTTP User Agent:
Browser type

==========================================================
The only possible conclusion one can reach when looking at the evidence is that
someone connected to the parked domain owner has taken the click URLs from
some or all of the ads, and loaded them into a script that submits our form with
the listed data, using the parking page ad URL as the referrer.

This is click fraud that shows as conversions to the advertiser.
==========================================================

Here is the PHP code that is used for this section of the form:
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Remote Address: $_SERVER[REMOTE_ADDR]
Form Sent From: $_SERVER[HTTP_REFERER]
HTTP User Agent: $_SERVER[HTTP_USER_AGENT]
---------------------------------------------------------------------
Adding this code, or code like it for other scripting languages, can provide advertisers with more information about who is clicking on their ads and why.

And you notice that we are capturing the IP address of the person submitting the form.While this can indicate fraud as well, for months now we have seen fraudulent clicks and conversions from IPs on Comcast and other ISPs. While I cannot provide proof, my feeling is that most of these are from infected or "botnet" computers, designed to steal small amounts of money on a vast scale. If I was in the fraud business, that's what I would do!

I suggest that anyone concerned about click fraud also be aware of conversion fraud. In this case, it is done with a program and is easy to spot. If cheap labor is used and your forms filled out by a person, you will have no way to know what is going on except from a lack of sales and perhaps invalid from information. At this time there is no way to update your PPC statistics and change the number of recorded conversions to be more accurate.

My proposed solution to end click fraud is a simple one, but one that is still dismissed by those that hear it: Flat rate advertising. Google actually has something like this with their site targeted option, but since you pay for impressions rather than clicks, you can have what I call "Impression fraud".

Only by having ads displayed for a set period of time at a set price can we ever hope to be free of these kinds of fraud.


Tuesday, August 11, 2009

Search Engine Optimization Plug-In by SEO

New Search Engine Optimization WordPress Plug-In by SEO Inc. at SES San Jose 2009 (Marketwire)
CARLSBAD, CA--(Marketwire - August 11, 2009) - SEO Inc., a leading full-service search engine marketing company, announced today the release of SEO Nova, a brand new WordPress plug-in for search engine optimization . While the popular open source blog publishing platform has several SEO plug-ins available, SEO Inc. has improved upon these with an easier user interface and most importantly by ...

Thursday, August 06, 2009

Bing Porn Search Easy

Is Searching For Porn Too Easy With Bing? (Search Engine Land)
Microsoft's new Bing search engine has its own unique approach to video search which has engendered both praise and pans. Perhaps the most remarked upon feature is the mouse hover over a thumbnail of a video and Bing will play 30 seconds of the clip with sound.


[Comment: Now Google is REALLY worried...!!!]

Sunday, August 02, 2009

Microsoft/Yahoo not only seach news

And then they were two. Microsoft is to deliver search results to Yahoo!, which means that there are only two search giants left: Google and Microsoft's Bing. But there are also other interesting headlines from the world of search engines.